HENRY LITTLEFIELD WIZARD OF OZ THESIS
One of the main arguments of opponents of endorsement was that Bryan had only adopted one of the Populist’s proposed economic reforms and the one he had “stolen”, unlimited coinage of silver, was one of their more minor economic reforms. In the book, the city is bland white, and all who enter must put on Emerald colored glasses. The Wizard was no real help, and the group took care of the Witch themselves. The Oz purists could only rejoice. Webarchive template wayback links All stub articles. In a recent history of the Populist movement, Gene Clanton wrote that while The Wonderful Wizard of Oz was “a classic parable on the silver crusade,” Littlefield had gotten some of it confused. Michael Patrick Hearn, the leading scholar on L.
In the book version of Oz, Dorothy treads the Yellow Brick Road in silver shoes, not in ruby slippers. Leach has shown us another new way of looking at the book, a way that emphasizes a different side of the Gilded Age–the fascination with the city and urban abundance, the rise of a new industrial ethic, and so on. Roots of the Progressives Greenback Labor Party- anti-monopoly, pro- paper currency, pro union Greenback Labor Party- anti-monopoly, pro-. Littlefield, “The Wizard of Oz: A Parable for Populism.
It is also interesting to note that Baum’s biographers are opposed to the notion that Baum had any political intent in writing The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Michael Patrick Hearn, the leading scholar on L. When the Populists convened two weeks later, they decided to endorse Bryan, putting all their reformist eggs thedis the free-silver basket.
His ideas have led to much speculation. In the book, the city is bland white, and all who enter must put on Emerald colored glasses. Littlefield linked the characters and the story line of the Oz tale to the political landscape of the Mauve Decade. He wrote an essay to this effect for his high-school students in Mount Vernon, New Yorkand published it  in the American Quarterly in Leach’s new look at Baum directly challenged much of what Littlefield wrote.
Henry Littlefield – Wikipedia
In the book, the Wizard appears to be a giant head to Dorothy, to the scarecrow, a gossamer fairy, to the Tin Man as a beast and to the Cowardly Lion as a ball of fire…just as politicians try to be all things to all people. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz is one of America’s favorite pieces of juvenile literature.
A Parable on Populism ,” which was published in the magazine American Quarterly in Is it time to move Littlefield henrj the computer trashpile of misinformation? This was the reason Littlefield, at the time a high school teacher, developed his analysis in the first place; the correspondences between Tyesis and The Wonderful Wizard of Ozhe wrote, “furnish a teaching mechanism which is guaranteed to reach any level of student.
The Bryan nomination dizard a split in the Democratic Party, as gold-standard delegates bolted the convention. Littlefield looked at The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and saw things no one had seen there before. Littlefield also indicated that Baum was sympathetic to the Populist movement, supported William Jennings Bryan in the election ofand, though not an activist, consistently voted for Democratic candidates. The Munchkins represent the eastern industrial laborers under the control of rich leaders of industry, beaten down and shrunken.
Oz Populism Theory
I also believe that it was meant as a parable with a “moral” to teach. Clanton explained as had Jensen that not all pro-Bryan silverites were Populists. He consistently voted as a democrat [sic], however, and his sympathies always seem to have been on the side of the laboring classes. Parable on Populism,” American Quarterly 16 He brings happiness to Dorothy, he is the one who exposes the Wizard at the end of the movie.
Inhe founded The Show Windowthe first journal ever devoted to decorating store windows, and in the same year as The Wonderful Wizard of Ozhe published The Art of Decorating Dry Goods Windows and Interiorsthe first book on the subject.
That would be a big mistake. Leach’s argument is just as compelling as Littlefield’s.
Furthermore, Baum’s Pioneerwhile clearly Republican, was quite progressive: Second, educators discovered Littlefield’s usefulness in teaching Populism and related topics. Littlefield’s article seems not to have been taken to heart and was generally forgotten, until Gore Vidalwriting about Oz in The New York Review of Books inmentioned the article, and the idea took off.
Genovese described The Wonderful Wizard of Oz as “the story of the sad collapse of Populism and the issues upon which the movement was based.
But there was one notable and somewhat disturbing aspect of Genovese’s piece: Durden, The Climax of Populism: Leach has shown us another new way of looking at the book, a way that emphasizes a different side of the Gilded Age–the fascination with the city and urban abundance, the rise of a new industrial ethic, and so on. A number of reform Democrats shared the Populists’ distrust of railroads and bankers,their support for inflation, and so forth, but the Democrats disagreed with the Populists’ call for a strong and active government to solve those problems, and in fact they tended to see Populists as dangerous socialist radicals.
So Was the Wizard of Oz an Allegory for Populism?
The Almighty Dollar and the Invention of America. Children like it because it is a good story, full of fun characters and exciting adventures.
Prejudiced notion that farmers were ignorant and not smart enough to recognize their own interests and felt too intimidated to enter the realm of politics. Less than a quarter century after his article appeared, Littlefield had entered the public domain.